Walmart’s $30 Onn 4K Plus Surpasses Google’s $100 TV Streamer in Initial Performance Tests

Walmart’s Onn 4K Plus has outperformed the Google TV Streamer in benchmark tests, showing significant differences in their raw Geekbench scores. While the performance of the Google TV Streamer was commendable, we found that it offered a great viewing experience and showcased speed and versatility, attributed to its robust hardware. However, there were concerns about whether this device would be fully future-proof. As time progresses, we will have a clearer understanding of the limitations of the Google TV Streamer.

Meanwhile, Walmart’s competitor is gaining attention not only for its affordability but also for its superior performance in benchmark numbers. Although raw numbers may not always resonate with the average consumer, they provide insight into the device capabilities. According to AFTVnews, Walmart’s Onn 4K Plus performed exceptionally well in benchmark tests. It is essential to recognize that while these tests are informative, they may not convey the complete user experience.

Nonetheless, Walmart’s budget streamer seems to hold its own against the competition, particularly given its lower price point compared to Google’s offering. The Onn 4K Plus ranks high among streaming devices, second only to notable mentions like the Amazon Fire TV Cube and Nvidia Shield. Its Geekbench scores reveal scores of 1146 for the single-core test and 3131 for the multi-core test, whereas the Google TV Streamer recorded lower scores of 917 in the single-core and 2527 in the multi-core tests. Ultimately, while the Google TV Streamer delivered a satisfactory performance, the headline here is Walmart’s growing competitiveness in the streaming device market.

As they continue to innovate with their Onn series, especially after the successful launch of the 4K Pro model last year, consumers should do thorough research before making a purchase. Consideration of individual needs and device longevity is also crucial in this rapidly evolving landscape.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *